Why is model maintenance important?
Creating a model that's fit to be deployed into a production environment requires an investment of time that is quickly paid back by the value of ongoing analytics and efficiency savings through automation.
If a model is not effectively maintained over the long term, the benefits provided by the model can be eroded away over time as model performance can potentially decrease without a small amount of supplementary training.
This is due to ‘concept drift’, which refers to the situation where the concepts a model is trying to predict can change in unforeseen ways over time, making predictions less and less accurate.
This essentially relates to how, over time, things can change in a business and the way it communicates internally, with other businesses and with its customers. If your model's training data is no longer representative of the way your business operates today, it will perform worse when trying to identify concepts within your communications data.
It’s therefore important for any model that is being used in a production environment that it is effectively maintained to ensure continued high-performance.
How do you maintain a model in production?
Maintaining a production model is a straightforward and low effort process. The majority of effort required has already been put in to create the training data for your model before it's deployed.
There are two main approaches to maintaining a model in Re:infer, both of which ensure that your model is provided with additional helpful and representative training examples:
- Exception training
- Using 'Rebalance' mode
1. Exception training
Any model used for automation purposes should have an exception process in place that identifies which verbatims were exceptions that Re:infer could not confidently or correctly identify (see here for more detail).
This is important as it essentially allows you to quickly find and label the verbatims Re:infer struggled with, which improves the model's ability to predict future similar verbatims.
Typically, an automation process will be set up to automatically flag verbatims with a user property that identifies it as an exception. You can then filter in Explore to those verbatims and label them with the correct labels, to ensure that Re:infer can confidently and correctly identify similar verbatims in future.
This should form part of a regular process that aims to consistently improve the model. The more exceptions are captured and labelled, the better a model will perform over time, minimising the number of future exceptions and maximising the efficiency savings that an automation focused model enables.
2. Using Balance and 'Rebalance' mode
Your model's 'Balance' rating is a component part of its Model Rating. This is a reflection of how similar, i.e. representative, your model's training data is to the dataset as a whole.
In theory, if the most recent data being added to a dataset over time is significantly different to the older data that was used to train the model, this would cause a drop in the similarity score that determines your model's Balance rating.
When doing exception training, it's important to check if the similarity score for the model drops. If it does, this should be addressed as it could be an indication of concept drift and will mean performance in production will ultimately fall.
The simplest way to correct a drop in the similarity score is to complete some training using 'Rebalance' mode.
To ensure that you train the most recent data that's representative of the kind of communications being received today, you can also add a timestamp filter whilst training in 'Rebalance', either to the last 3 or 6 months. This ensures that your model is not solely relying on training data that is old and may not reflect any changes in your business.